PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.75%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of SNAP's 34.28%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
32.33%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of SNAP's 36.36%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
58.89%
EBIT growth similar to SNAP's 61.46%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
58.89%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 42.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
42.99%
Net income growth comparable to SNAP's 43.41%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
43.27%
EPS growth similar to SNAP's 44.93%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
43.17%
Similar diluted EPS growth to SNAP's 45.57%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-0.03%
Share reduction while SNAP is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.08%
Reduced diluted shares while SNAP is at 1.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.86%
OCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 4.16%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
53.56%
FCF growth above 1.5x SNAP's 0.81%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
2009.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 1337.43%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
376.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 1337.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
121.15%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 170.64%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
2239.52%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 73.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
392.36%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 73.53%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
87.06%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 74.68%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
3057.02%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 40.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
615.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 40.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
168.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 72.58%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2125.44%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 57.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
187.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 57.35%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
76.34%
Positive short-term equity growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.26%
AR growth well above SNAP's 40.47%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
Asset growth above 1.5x SNAP's 4.29%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
9.01%
BV/share growth above 1.5x SNAP's 5.95%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.36%
Debt shrinking faster vs. SNAP's 1.27%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
9.34%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SNAP's 12.27%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
9.08%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 16.81%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.