PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.07%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of SNAP's 21.59%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
17.57%
Gross profit growth under 50% of SNAP's 36.02%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
20.74%
EBIT growth below 50% of SNAP's 159.21%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
20.74%
Operating income growth under 50% of SNAP's 86.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
11.87%
Net income growth under 50% of SNAP's 131.34%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
13.76%
EPS growth under 50% of SNAP's 121.98%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
14.29%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of SNAP's 121.98%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-2.04%
Share reduction while SNAP is at 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.10%
Reduced diluted shares while SNAP is at 5.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.48%
OCF growth under 50% of SNAP's 159.29%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
30.23%
FCF growth under 50% of SNAP's 211.24%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
2514.07%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 1770.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
300.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 396.30%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
105.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 174.87%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
3016.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 185.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
284.75%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 170.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
143.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of SNAP's 221.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
2890.34%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 110.88% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
202.70%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 108.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
54.20%
Below 50% of SNAP's 109.71%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
2138.24%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 133.93%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
121.04%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 58.09%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
53.16%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 35.40%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.14%
AR growth well above SNAP's 17.00%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.12%
Negative asset growth while SNAP invests at 5.98%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.41%
We have a declining book value while SNAP shows 8.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
9.75%
Debt growth far above SNAP's 1.16%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
11.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. SNAP's 5.38%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
18.34%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 11.93%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.