PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.71%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x SNAP's 8.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
15.61%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x SNAP's 4.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
22.02%
Positive EBIT growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
22.02%
Positive operating income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
36.42%
Positive net income growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
37.10%
Positive EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
35.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.73%
Share reduction while SNAP is at 1.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.62%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x SNAP's 1.38%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.65%
Positive OCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
55.02%
Positive FCF growth while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1609.29%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of SNAP's 8919.44%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
175.94%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 228.80%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
91.82%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of SNAP's 112.19%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
1168.00%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 31.22%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
213.53%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 66.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
399.99%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2178.64%
Positive 10Y CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
74.03%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 13.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
68.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
951.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 951.13% while SNAP is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
92.65%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while SNAP is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
35.94%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x SNAP's 3.02%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.28%
AR growth well above SNAP's 11.60%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.03%
Positive asset growth while SNAP is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.20%
Positive BV/share change while SNAP is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
31.34%
We have some new debt while SNAP reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.39%
Our R&D shrinks while SNAP invests at 4.96%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
23.43%
SG&A growth well above SNAP's 8.43%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.