PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.31%
Revenue growth above 1.5x TWLO's 6.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
19.46%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x TWLO's 10.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
29.30%
Positive EBIT growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
29.30%
Positive operating income growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.32%
Positive net income growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
24.00%
Positive EPS growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
20.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.32%
Slight or no buybacks while TWLO is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.23%
Diluted share change of 0.23% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.36%
OCF growth of 4.36% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
-5.42%
Negative FCF growth while TWLO is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
206.53%
10Y CAGR of 206.53% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if incremental growth can widen into a significant edge.
206.53%
5Y CAGR of 206.53% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small improvements can scale into a larger advantage.
206.53%
3Y CAGR of 206.53% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
880.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 880.04% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
880.04%
OCF/share CAGR of 880.04% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
880.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 880.04% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
209.54%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 209.54% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
209.54%
Net income/share CAGR of 209.54% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
209.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 209.54% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.29%
AR growth of 18.29% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.15%
Asset growth of 9.15% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
9.27%
BV/share growth of 9.27% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-16.84%
We’re deleveraging while TWLO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
8.13%
We increase R&D while TWLO cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.82%
SG&A growth well above TWLO's 9.33%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.