PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.12%
Negative revenue growth while TWLO stands at 3.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-19.84%
Negative gross profit growth while TWLO is at 7.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-32.27%
Negative EBIT growth while TWLO is at 23.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-32.27%
Negative operating income growth while TWLO is at 23.21%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-27.42%
Negative net income growth while TWLO stands at 23.94%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-26.34%
Negative EPS growth while TWLO is at 24.54%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-26.09%
Negative diluted EPS growth while TWLO is at 24.54%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.58%
Share reduction while TWLO is at 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.04%
Reduced diluted shares while TWLO is at 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.25%
Negative OCF growth while TWLO is at 54.04%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-32.19%
Negative FCF growth while TWLO is at 40.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1969.67%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x TWLO's 331.43%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
274.77%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of TWLO's 390.77%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
94.11%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of TWLO's 141.99%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
2404.37%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x TWLO's 67.69%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
200.17%
Positive OCF/share growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
58.59%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2757.16%
Positive 10Y CAGR while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
163.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while TWLO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
222.29%
Positive short-term CAGR while TWLO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1627.48%
Equity/share CAGR of 1627.48% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
113.73%
Below 50% of TWLO's 1482.87%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
49.37%
Below 50% of TWLO's 111.46%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.87%
Firm’s AR is declining while TWLO shows 4.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.07%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.29%
Positive BV/share change while TWLO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.30%
We have some new debt while TWLO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
9.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. TWLO's 7.78%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-26.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.