PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.94%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.42%
Negative gross profit growth while TWLO is at 1.98%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-28.72%
Negative EBIT growth while TWLO is at 132.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-28.72%
Negative operating income growth while TWLO is at 132.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
22.70%
Positive net income growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.57%
Positive EPS growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.93%
Share reduction while TWLO is at 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.67%
Reduced diluted shares while TWLO is at 0.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
30.87%
Positive FCF growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1780.52%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x TWLO's 381.45%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
172.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of TWLO's 295.95%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
78.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of TWLO's 106.06%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
1763.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
102.70%
Positive OCF/share growth while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
41.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2418.18%
Positive 10Y CAGR while TWLO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
30.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while TWLO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
29.05%
Positive short-term CAGR while TWLO is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
910.23%
Equity/share CAGR of 910.23% while TWLO is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
82.99%
Below 50% of TWLO's 1345.61%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
31.32%
Below 50% of TWLO's 81.08%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.99%
Firm’s AR is declining while TWLO shows 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.23%
Positive BV/share change while TWLO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.70%
We have some new debt while TWLO reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-3.99%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-22.59%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.