PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
743.76 - 757.57
479.80 - 796.25
8.25M / 11.73M (Avg.)
27.40 | 27.58
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
2.68
0.5–0.75x SNAP's 3.76. Martin Whitman would question if short-term obligations are sufficiently covered.
2.68
0.5–0.75x SNAP's 3.76. Martin Whitman might be concerned about coverage if a crisis hits.
1.15
Cash Ratio 1.25–1.5x SNAP's 0.95. Bruce Berkowitz might see a strong liquidity buffer compared to the competitor.
108.80
Positive interest coverage while SNAP shows negative coverage. John Neff would examine our debt service advantages in a challenging market.
11.48
Short-term coverage of 11.48 while SNAP has zero coverage. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if our cash flow management provides advantages.