5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-29.06%
Cash & equivalents declining signals potential liquidity drain. Benjamin Graham would investigate if this is from strategic investments or operational shortfalls.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.06%
Declining total liquid assets may signal capital redeployment or liquidity concerns. Howard Marks would investigate the underlying causes.
9.45%
Net receivables growing more than 5% yoy – potential collection risk if top-line isn't equally strong. Philip Fisher would demand clarity on credit policy vs. revenue gains.
-5.88%
Declining inventory generally indicates efficient management. Seth Klarman would confirm this doesn't create stock-out risks.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.96%
Declining current assets may signal efficient working capital or liquidity concerns. Benjamin Graham would investigate the composition of the decline.
-1.86%
Declining PP&E may indicate underinvestment or asset sales. Seth Klarman would question future capacity constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.00%
Declining intangible assets reduces future impairment risk. Benjamin Graham would favor this balance sheet simplification.
-2.82%
Declining total intangibles reduces balance sheet risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving asset quality.
1.38%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight change. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm is cautious or sees limited investment opportunities.
4.88%
Up to 5% yoy – slight increase. Howard Marks would confirm if it stems from minor new deferrals or small losses.
18400.00%
Above 5% yoy – possibly big expansions in intangible or unusual assets. Philip Fisher would question synergy and risk of misallocation.
0.69%
Growth 0-5% yoy – slight. Peter Lynch might see it as conservative expansion or replacement-level spending.
-100.00%
Declining other assets reduces balance sheet complexity. Benjamin Graham would see this as improving transparency.
-1.86%
Declining total assets may signal asset sales or strategic downsizing. Seth Klarman would investigate the strategic rationale.
-20.03%
Declining payables indicates faster supplier payments but reduces free financing. Howard Marks would verify liquidity remains adequate.
-2.09%
Declining short-term debt reduces immediate leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as improving financial safety.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.05%
Declining other current liabilities reduces near-term obligations. Benjamin Graham would see this as improving short-term financial position.
-14.31%
Declining current liabilities reduces short-term financial pressure. Seth Klarman would see this as improving liquidity position.
-3.52%
Declining long-term debt reduces leverage risk. Howard Marks would see this as improving financial stability.
-0.91%
Declining non-current deferred revenue may signal weaker long-term contract pipeline. Benjamin Graham would investigate business model sustainability.
7.20%
Up to 20% yoy – a noticeable rise. Howard Marks questions if future tax liabilities might weigh on returns.
-93.33%
Declining other non-current liabilities reduces long-term obligations. Howard Marks would see this as improving future financial flexibility.
-2.21%
Declining total non-current liabilities reduces long-term leverage risk. Benjamin Graham would see this as strengthening the balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.41%
Declining total liabilities strengthens the balance sheet. Howard Marks would see this as reducing financial risk.
5.55%
Above 5% yoy – more significant share issuance. Philip Fisher demands a strong ROI or else it's dilution.
88.47%
≥ 20% yoy – strong reinvested profits. Benjamin Graham checks that earnings quality is high.
4.28%
Up to 20% yoy – moderate increase. Howard Marks warns these gains can reverse if markets shift.
-12.08%
Declining other equity items simplifies the capital structure. Benjamin Graham would favor this reduction in complexity.
5.55%
5-10% yoy – solid improvement. Benjamin Graham sees stable reinvestment or capital additions.
-1.86%
Declining total capital may indicate asset sales or poor capital allocation. Howard Marks would investigate strategic implications.
5.04%
5-10% yoy – moderate. Seth Klarman finds it normal if the returns justify capital usage.
-3.10%
Declining total debt reduces leverage risk. Seth Klarman would see this as improving financial stability and flexibility.
8.08%
Above 5% yoy – net debt expansion. Philip Fisher demands clarity on the reason for higher leverage vs. cash.
