PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.96%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with HUH1V.HE at -11.21%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
49.70%
Some D&A expansion while HUH1V.HE is negative at -3.43%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
96.45%
Well above HUH1V.HE's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with HUH1V.HE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-319.52%
Both reduce yoy usage, with HUH1V.HE at -116.92%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth while HUH1V.HE is negative at -125.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
100.00%
Some inventory rise while HUH1V.HE is negative at -126.24%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while HUH1V.HE is 133.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-126.74%
Negative yoy usage while HUH1V.HE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
226.44%
Some yoy increase while HUH1V.HE is negative at -4214.29%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
80.06%
Some CFO growth while HUH1V.HE is negative at -46.20%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
27.63%
CapEx growth well above HUH1V.HE's 51.05%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with HUH1V.HE at -622.73%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
100.00%
Some yoy expansion while HUH1V.HE is negative at -732.35%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with HUH1V.HE at -38.54%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
16.67%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. HUH1V.HE's 3761.90%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
39.94%
Investing outflow well above HUH1V.HE's 75.47%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
97.53%
Debt repayment 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 80.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would see an edge in lowering interest burdens unless competitor invests in profitable expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while HUH1V.HE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.