PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.96%
Negative net income growth while STERV.HE stands at 11.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
49.70%
Some D&A expansion while STERV.HE is negative at -5.45%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
96.45%
Well above STERV.HE's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with STERV.HE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-319.52%
Both reduce yoy usage, with STERV.HE at -605.88%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth well above STERV.HE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above STERV.HE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while STERV.HE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-126.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with STERV.HE at -119.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
226.44%
Some yoy increase while STERV.HE is negative at -766.67%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
80.06%
Some CFO growth while STERV.HE is negative at -48.37%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
27.63%
Some CapEx rise while STERV.HE is negative at -12.95%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with STERV.HE at -11733.33%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
100.00%
Purchases well above STERV.HE's 90.91%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with STERV.HE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
16.67%
We have some outflow growth while STERV.HE is negative at -72.22%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
39.94%
We have mild expansions while STERV.HE is negative at -218.82%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
97.53%
We repay more while STERV.HE is negative at -351.35%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while STERV.HE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.