PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-58.52%
Negative net income growth while UPM.HE stands at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.78%
Some D&A expansion while UPM.HE is negative at -5.88%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.56%
Negative yoy working capital usage while UPM.HE is 125.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.56%
Negative yoy usage while UPM.HE is 125.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
68.07%
Well above UPM.HE's 32.58%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
335.14%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 240.48%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
-2812.21%
Both yoy lines negative, with UPM.HE at -14.49%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while UPM.HE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11556.52%
We reduce yoy other investing while UPM.HE is 12.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-3001.63%
We reduce yoy invests while UPM.HE stands at 40.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
56.18%
Debt repayment growth of 56.18% while UPM.HE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.