PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
86.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.23%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
0.38%
D&A growth of 0.38% while UPM.HE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.39%
Well above UPM.HE's 121.09% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.39%
Growth well above UPM.HE's 121.09%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-722.58%
Negative yoy while UPM.HE is 33.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.69%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 200.00%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-252.54%
Both yoy lines negative, with UPM.HE at -36.59%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7220.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with UPM.HE at -26.25%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-260.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with UPM.HE at -28.75%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-764.71%
We cut debt repayment yoy while UPM.HE is 63.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
-100.00%
Negative yoy issuance while UPM.HE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.