PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.96%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with UPM.HE at -63.62%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
49.70%
Some D&A expansion while UPM.HE is negative at -0.86%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
96.45%
Well above UPM.HE's 100.00% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-100.00%
Both cut yoy SBC, with UPM.HE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-319.52%
Both reduce yoy usage, with UPM.HE at -139.56%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
100.00%
AR growth well above UPM.HE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
100.00%
Inventory growth well above UPM.HE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-100.00%
Negative yoy AP while UPM.HE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-126.74%
Both reduce yoy usage, with UPM.HE at -113.41%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
226.44%
Well above UPM.HE's 53.77%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
80.06%
Some CFO growth while UPM.HE is negative at -54.70%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
27.63%
CapEx growth well above UPM.HE's 27.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while UPM.HE stands at 127.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
100.00%
Purchases well above UPM.HE's 100.00%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines are negative, with UPM.HE at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
16.67%
We have some outflow growth while UPM.HE is negative at -210.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
39.94%
Investing outflow well above UPM.HE's 22.60%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
97.53%
Debt repayment above 1.5x UPM.HE's 34.30%, indicating stronger deleveraging. David Dodd would verify if expansions are not neglected.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while UPM.HE is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.