5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-58.52%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 7.73%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
3.78%
D&A growth under 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 1.18%, or significantly exceeding it. Jim Chanos would suspect overcapacity or misallocated capex if new assets do not pay off quickly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.56%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.56%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
68.07%
Under 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 19.93% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
335.14%
CFO growth of 335.14% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-2812.21%
CapEx declines yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11556.52%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-3001.63%
Reduced investing yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
56.18%
Debt repayment growth of 56.18% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.