5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-51.01%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
151.85%
Working capital of 151.85% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
151.85%
Growth of 151.85% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
114.25%
Under 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 16.51% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
65.77%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 12.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
43.75%
CapEx growth of 43.75% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.03%
Growth of 98.03% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
43.75%
Slight expansions while Packaging & Containers median is negative at -0.99%. Peter Lynch wonders if peers are more cautious or have fewer investment opportunities.
87.07%
Debt repayment growth of 87.07% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.