5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.29%
Net income growth near Packaging & Containers median of 12.67%. Charlie Munger would view it as typical for the industry’s current cycle.
23.00%
D&A growth of 23.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
996.30%
Working capital of 996.30% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
996.30%
Under 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 44.25% if negative or far above if positive. Jim Chanos would sense potential red flags or large tie-ups in these rarely monitored accounts.
-35.53%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
81.94%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 5.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
39.34%
CapEx growth of 39.34% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-101.85%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-27.94%
Reduced investing yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
50.50%
Debt repayment growth of 50.50% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.