PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
28.03%
Net income growth of 28.03% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
8.12%
D&A growth of 8.12% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-197.28%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -139.29%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
-100.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-332.52%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -64.59%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
145.05%
A moderate rise while Packaging & Containers median is negative at -20.65%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-71.54%
Negative CFO growth while Packaging & Containers median is -32.98%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
62.96%
CapEx growth of 62.96% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
63.06%
Investing flow of 63.06% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
87.71%
Debt repayment growth of 87.71% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.