5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
18.73%
Net income growth near Packaging & Containers median of 17.62%. Charlie Munger would view it as typical for the industry’s current cycle.
30.33%
D&A growth of 30.33% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-2293.75%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -124.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-229.17%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -8.70%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
168.70%
Under 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 23.69% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
19.74%
Positive CFO growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative at -31.24%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
79.88%
CapEx growth of 79.88% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.51%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
118.75%
Investing flow of 118.75% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
-114.01%
Debt repayment yoy declines while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman fears increased leverage if expansions do not yield quick returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.