5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.22%
Net income growth near Packaging & Containers median of 30.22%. Charlie Munger would view it as typical for the industry’s current cycle.
15.05%
D&A growth of 15.05% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-298.50%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -150.79%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-100.00%
AR shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -53.81%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-100.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3890.48%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -88.68%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
129.31%
Under 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 0.33% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos would flag potential major accounting illusions or revaluations overshadowing underlying performance.
-79.26%
Negative CFO growth while Packaging & Containers median is -35.82%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
17.96%
CapEx growth under 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 5.32% or substantially above. Jim Chanos would see potential overspending or misallocation if top-line is not keeping pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.24%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
9.19%
Under 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 9.19% if negative or well above if positive. Jim Chanos sees potential overspending or major liquidity drain overshadowing typical sector levels.
53.24%
Debt repayment growth of 53.24% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.