PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
12.53%
Net income growth of 12.53% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would note a slight edge that could grow if sustained.
9.77%
D&A expands slightly while Packaging & Containers is negative at -0.26%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
200.00%
Deferred tax growth of 200.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.27%
Working capital of 74.27% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.27%
Growth of 74.27% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or unusual one-time factors behind the difference.
-87.61%
Other non-cash items dropping yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term advantage if real fundamentals remain intact.
2359.26%
Operating cash flow growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a strong operational advantage vs. peers.
36.89%
CapEx growth of 36.89% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.60%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
15.16%
Investing flow of 15.16% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
70.11%
Debt repayment growth of 70.11% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.