PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-67.86%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -3.61%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
40.56%
D&A growth of 40.56% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
Working capital of 48.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would check if expansions or cost inefficiencies cause that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-128.33%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
321.43%
Growth of 321.43% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
62.27%
CFO growth of 62.27% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-49.89%
CapEx declines yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
1383.78%
Acquisition growth of 1383.78% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or partial deals fueling that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3875.00%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-44.04%
Reduced investing yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
40.52%
Debt repayment growth of 40.52% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.