PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
1355.56%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 24.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
33.99%
D&A growth of 33.99% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
-65.63%
Deferred tax shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see potential advantage if actual tax outflows do not spike.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-179.17%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -82.90%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-100.00%
AR shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -42.49%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-100.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -30.38%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
100.00%
AP growth of 100.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or credit policies affecting the difference.
-313.53%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Packaging & Containers median is -33.57%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
770.97%
A moderate rise while Packaging & Containers median is negative at -7.39%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-106.36%
Negative CFO growth while Packaging & Containers median is -36.89%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
66.72%
CapEx growth of 66.72% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
110.82%
Growth of 110.82% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
69.78%
Investing flow of 69.78% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
95.65%
Debt repayment growth of 95.65% while Packaging & Containers median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.