PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-58.52%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.99%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
3.78%
D&A growth of 3.78% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.56%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.56%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
68.07%
Growth of 68.07% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
335.14%
CFO growth of 335.14% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a small edge that may compound with consistent execution.
-2812.21%
CapEx declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note a short-term FCF advantage if revenue is stable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11556.52%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
-3001.63%
Reduced investing yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage in near-term liquidity if revenue remains stable.
56.18%
Debt repayment growth of 56.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.