PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.42%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative at -22.43%. Peter Lynch would view it as a strong advantage vs. struggling peers.
-35.03%
D&A shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a short-term earnings benefit if capacity is sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-104.69%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.39%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
418.52%
Growth of 418.52% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or one-off revaluations explaining the difference.
-10.71%
Negative CFO growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -6.22%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
42.56%
CapEx growth of 42.56% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.70%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
33.26%
Investing flow of 33.26% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
99.07%
Debt repayment growth of 99.07% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.