PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
30.22%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 8.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see it as a clear outperformance relative to peers.
15.05%
D&A growth of 15.05% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question intangible or new expansions driving that cost difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-298.50%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
-100.00%
AR shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage in working capital if sales do not drop.
-100.00%
Inventory shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a working capital edge if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3890.48%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
129.31%
A moderate rise while Consumer Cyclical median is negative at -36.99%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
-79.26%
Negative CFO growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific operational weakness if peers maintain growth.
17.96%
CapEx growth of 17.96% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-95.24%
We reduce “other investing” yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a potential advantage in preserving cash if top-line growth is not harmed.
9.19%
Investing flow of 9.19% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
53.24%
Debt repayment growth of 53.24% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.