5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-15.96%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.87%. Seth Klarman would suspect a firm-specific problem if peers maintain profit growth.
49.70%
D&A expands slightly while Consumer Cyclical is negative at -1.28%. Peter Lynch might see peers pausing expansions more aggressively.
96.45%
Deferred tax growth of 96.45% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see a difference that might matter for future cash flow if significant.
-100.00%
SBC declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a near-term advantage in less dilution unless new hires are needed.
-319.52%
Working capital is shrinking yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if sales remain robust.
100.00%
AR growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or more relaxed credit if revenue is not matching it.
100.00%
Inventory growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question if expansions or new product lines require extra stock.
-100.00%
AP shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see better immediate cost coverage if top-line remains intact.
-126.74%
Other WC usage shrinks yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if top-line is stable or growing.
226.44%
A moderate rise while Consumer Cyclical median is negative at -38.14%. Peter Lynch might see peers cleaning up intangible or one-time items more aggressively.
80.06%
Positive CFO growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative at -9.45%. Peter Lynch would see a notable cash advantage in a challenging sector environment.
27.63%
CapEx growth of 27.63% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or upgrades behind the difference.
-100.00%
Acquisition spending declines yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would note reduced M&A risk if growth continues organically.
100.00%
Purchases growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or new strategic positions driving the difference.
-100.00%
We liquidate less yoy while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific hold strategy unless missed gains exist.
16.67%
Growth of 16.67% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss questions intangible or special projects explaining that difference.
39.94%
Investing flow of 39.94% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or deals prompting that difference.
97.53%
Debt repayment growth of 97.53% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss wonders if expansions or a shift in capital structure drive that difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero at 0.00%. Walter Schloss would question expansions or higher yoy CFO enabling that difference.