PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.45%
Positive revenue growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.45%
Positive gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-106.06%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-106.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-157.89%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-156.42%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-156.42%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-228.57%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 36.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 16.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
6.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
6.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-142.78%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 22.38%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-142.78%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 22.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-142.78%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 22.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
68.48%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 27849.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
68.48%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 27849.58%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
68.48%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 27849.58%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
5.73%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 13.17%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
5.73%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 13.17%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
5.73%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 13.17%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.09%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 5.74%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.20%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 0.84%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.19%
We have a declining book value while HUH1V.HE shows 5.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.74%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.