5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.32%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.80%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
86.36%
Positive EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
86.36%
Positive operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
400.00%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
333.33%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
333.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
23.08%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
23.08%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-192.65%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 76.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-324.78%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 59.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-13.56%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-13.56%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-13.56%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-179.07%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 39.96%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-179.07%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 39.96%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-179.07%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 39.96%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
160.54%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 25799.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
160.54%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 25799.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
160.54%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 25799.10%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-3.23%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while HUH1V.HE stands at 18.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-3.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 18.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-3.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 18.41%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.70%
We show growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.95%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-14.94%
We have a declining book value while HUH1V.HE shows 3.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-3.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.