PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.560.02 (-0.36%)
5.56 - 5.56
4.95 - 8.28
45 / 2.4K (Avg.)
-278.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.11%
Positive revenue growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.69%
Positive gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.12%
Negative EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is at 14.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-15.12%
Negative operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is at 14.78%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-80.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-84.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-84.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
30.00%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 1.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
30.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 1.09%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.32%
Positive OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
167.70%
Positive FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-28.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 9.75%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-28.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 9.75%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-29.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 15.32%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
623.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
623.18%
Positive OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
181.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
105.76%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 13.65% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
105.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 13.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-66.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 7.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 12.10%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.21%
Negative near-term dividend growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.78%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 9.16%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.92%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 2.82%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-25.54%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.64%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 1.87%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.