PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.02%
Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 8.88%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.03%
Negative gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is at 9.10%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-16.95%
Negative EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is at 12.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.95%
Negative operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is at 12.60%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
120.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 15.16%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
200.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 12.50%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 12.50%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-26.67%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-26.67%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
5272.73%
Dividend growth of 5272.73% while HUH1V.HE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-108.37%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 976.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-148.00%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 224.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-2.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 28.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.89%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 28.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-32.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 15.55%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
79.10%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
79.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
84.71%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 12.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
120.93%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 9.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
120.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 9.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
300.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.04%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.87%
Firm’s AR is declining while HUH1V.HE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
4.86%
We show growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.06%
Asset growth well under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 4.88%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
32.93%
Positive BV/share change while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.44%
Debt shrinking faster vs. HUH1V.HE's 29.96%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.39%
SG&A growth well above HUH1V.HE's 2.53%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.