PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.44%
Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 11.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-1.81%
Negative gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is at 21.54%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-25.98%
Negative EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is at 32.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-25.98%
Negative operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is at 32.03%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.26%
Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 38.63%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-28.53%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 37.04%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-28.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 37.04%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-5.16%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.16%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
581.58%
OCF growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 73.58%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
429.66%
FCF growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 54.39%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-19.12%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 29.92%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-19.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 29.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-24.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 16.54%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
538.22%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
538.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
439.86%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
116.94%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 49.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
116.94%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 49.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
128.56%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 20.17%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.76%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.88%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 9.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
0.06%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 4.68%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-0.31%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.94%
Positive BV/share change while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.98%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 1.33%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.12%
SG&A declining or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 16.63%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.