PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.27%
Revenue growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 46.33%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
145.19%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 53.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
543.28%
EBIT growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 50.84%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
543.28%
Operating income growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 50.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
380.33%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
411.36%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
411.36%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.09%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-6.09%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-83.99%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-14.10%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 20.60%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-15.06%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 26.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-9.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 12.22%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
572.66%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
173.52%
Positive OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
8.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 99.72%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
125.94%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 37.14% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
50.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 29.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
282.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 11.06%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.37%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 29.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
19.97%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 16.29%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.60%
AR growth well above HUH1V.HE's 53.84%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
4.72%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 26.71%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.86%
Asset growth at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 11.38%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
18.20%
BV/share growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 10.77%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.72%
Debt shrinking faster vs. HUH1V.HE's 7.89%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while HUH1V.HE invests at 65.22%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
4.05%
SG&A declining or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 39.45%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.