PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.70%
Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 13.25%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.46%
Gross profit growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 24.53%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
55.92%
EBIT growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 12.42%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
55.92%
Operating income growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 12.42%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
86.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 14.48%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
66.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 10.34%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
66.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 10.34%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
12.01%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.21%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
12.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.21%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.69%
OCF growth under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 1166.04%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-407.87%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 255.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-18.90%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 47.11%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-43.53%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 32.80%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-10.34%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 12.91%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
353.57%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
285.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 34.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
256.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 20.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
152.33%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 32.31% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
600.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-64.97%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.27%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 10.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
12.10%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 8.27%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.47%
Firm’s AR is declining while HUH1V.HE shows 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-8.40%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.19%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.07%
We’re deleveraging while HUH1V.HE stands at 5.62%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.08%
SG&A declining or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 8.84%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.