5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.11%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-61.24%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-37.55%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.55%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1.12%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.12%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.76%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 67.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.72%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 96.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-27.90%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 3.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-32.57%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 39.92%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-16.60%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 16.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
51.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 67.11%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
455.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 36.55%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
292.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 19.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
136.84%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 37951.89%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
216.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 36.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-39.15%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 47.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
6.18%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 34.22%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
0.42%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 18.60%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
9.72%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 13.36%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.12%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.02%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.63%
Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.28%
Under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 8.93%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-2.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.02%
SG&A declining or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 39.09%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.