PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.14%
Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 1.71%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-51.16%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
44.74%
Positive EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
44.74%
Positive operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
32.80%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
32.80%
Positive EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
32.80%
Positive diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.66%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 56.82%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.78%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-40.75%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 9.94%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-28.21%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 36.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-14.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 27.66%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
13.15%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 102.09%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
273.87%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 31.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
59.82%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 124.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
130.92%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 41844.41%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
110.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 79.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
-23.14%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 187.67%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
-2.19%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while HUH1V.HE stands at 51.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
28.23%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 41.70%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
19.89%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 44.31%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.58%
Firm’s AR is declining while HUH1V.HE shows 1.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-0.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.76%
Asset growth at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 5.51%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.90%
75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 6.49%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-10.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.10%
We cut SG&A while HUH1V.HE invests at 9.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.