PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.77%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
4.85%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 6.10%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
-106.45%
Negative EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is at 55.81%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-106.45%
Negative operating income growth while HUH1V.HE is at 55.81%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-48.94%
Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 96.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-48.48%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 97.62%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-48.48%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 97.62%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.27%
Positive OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
78.55%
Positive FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-10.52%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 79.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-6.75%
Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 26.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-11.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 26.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
282.17%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x HUH1V.HE's 223.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
313.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 72.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
52.30%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 13.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-92.17%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 472.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-95.17%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 375.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-95.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 180.78%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
126.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with HUH1V.HE's 132.19%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
44.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 50.14%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
36.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 42.90%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.97%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-6.14%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.88%
Positive asset growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.87%
Positive BV/share change while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.33%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.82%
SG&A growth well above HUH1V.HE's 14.72%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.