5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.40%
Revenue growth above 1.5x HUH1V.HE's 3.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
-35.41%
Negative gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is at 8.12%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-61.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-61.56%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-168.70%
Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 79.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-168.65%
Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 77.14%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-168.65%
Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 77.14%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.13%
Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.13%
Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.09%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.86%
Negative OCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 28.88%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-18.92%
Negative FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is at 31.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
0.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 63.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
9.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 19.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-8.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 17.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-109.17%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 345.88%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-128.66%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-106.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 1.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-152.24%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 67.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-125.37%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 21.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-111.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 25.36%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
103.75%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 135.21%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
39.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 50.37%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
11.68%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 41.17%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
193.55%
Stable or rising dividend while HUH1V.HE is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-11.88%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-4.37%
Negative near-term dividend growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 15.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
14.48%
Our AR growth while HUH1V.HE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
1.28%
Inventory growth well above HUH1V.HE's 2.43%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.36%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.26%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
8.90%
We have some new debt while HUH1V.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.92%
SG&A declining or stable vs. HUH1V.HE's 31.05%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.