Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)

Negative revenue growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 3.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is at 10.15%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while HUH1V.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Negative net income growth while HUH1V.HE stands at 7.60%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while HUH1V.HE is at 7.02%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Share count expansion well above HUH1V.HE's 0.55%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above HUH1V.HE's 0.55%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 143.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 20.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 5.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 60.36%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 242.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 51.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 32.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 9.95%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 134.17%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 51.02%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while HUH1V.HE is at 33.89%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative asset growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 1.44%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

We have a declining book value while HUH1V.HE shows 8.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.