PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.80%
Positive revenue growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
25.99%
Positive gross profit growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-1760.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-123.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
4.11%
Positive net income growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.11%
Share reduction while HUH1V.HE is at 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.11%
Reduced diluted shares while HUH1V.HE is at 0.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
100.00%
Positive FCF growth while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-14.93%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 57.11%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
7.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of HUH1V.HE's 18.09%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-16.09%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE stands at 34.27%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-100.00%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-100.00%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-122.22%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is at 89.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-133.33%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while HUH1V.HE is 3.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-106.42%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
76.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of HUH1V.HE's 109.69%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
41.98%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of HUH1V.HE's 48.09%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
6.66%
Below 50% of HUH1V.HE's 23.18%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
-41.67%
Cut dividends over 10 years while HUH1V.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-82.93%
Negative near-term dividend growth while HUH1V.HE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while HUH1V.HE shows 3.80%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while HUH1V.HE stands at 5.33%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.06%
Positive asset growth while HUH1V.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
68.69%
Positive BV/share change while HUH1V.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.