5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.80%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-56.27%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-80.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-80.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-70.67%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-69.81%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-69.81%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.89%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.89%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.83%
Similar OCF growth to METSB.HE's 44.83%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
21.40%
FCF growth similar to METSB.HE's 21.40%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-24.72%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-24.72%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-8.80%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
65.54%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with METSB.HE's 65.54%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
65.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to METSB.HE's 65.54%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
446.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 446.94%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
108.19%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 108.19%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
108.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 108.19%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
102.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 102.79%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
-16.09%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-16.09%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
10.00%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 10.00%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.25%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.35%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.32%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.41%
Similar to METSB.HE's 1.41%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-2.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.