PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.04%
Revenue growth similar to METSB.HE's 4.04%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-8.38%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.90%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-22.90%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-19.83%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-16.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-16.67%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-3.79%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-3.79%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
401.80%
Similar OCF growth to METSB.HE's 401.80%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
168.23%
FCF growth similar to METSB.HE's 168.23%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-39.39%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-42.40%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-15.23%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-14.87%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
200.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to METSB.HE's 200.18%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
645.27%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 645.27%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
120.83%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 120.83%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
145.45%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 145.45%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
150.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 150.00%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.34%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
17.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 17.76%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.96%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.28%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.41%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
4.38%
Similar to METSB.HE's 4.38%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-1.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.34%
SG&A growth well above METSB.HE's 1.34%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.