PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.54%
Revenue growth similar to METSB.HE's 2.54%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
-5.90%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-8.41%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.41%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-10.47%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-8.60%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-8.60%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.06%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.06%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
42.67%
Similar OCF growth to METSB.HE's 42.67%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
99.25%
FCF growth similar to METSB.HE's 99.25%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-29.49%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-4.39%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
16.34%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 16.34%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
-41.77%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-14.26%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-31.60%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
138.09%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 138.09%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
56.90%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 56.90%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
82.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 82.83%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with METSB.HE's 52.58%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
35.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 35.39%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.70%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-3.27%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.08%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.61%
Similar to METSB.HE's 3.61%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-1.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.62%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.