PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.32%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
8.60%
Gross profit growth similar to METSB.HE's 8.60%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
69.00%
EBIT growth similar to METSB.HE's 69.00%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
69.00%
Operating income growth similar to METSB.HE's 69.00%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
36.42%
Net income growth comparable to METSB.HE's 36.42%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
20.00%
EPS growth similar to METSB.HE's 20.00%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
20.00%
Similar diluted EPS growth to METSB.HE's 20.00%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
13.68%
Share count expansion well above METSB.HE's 13.68%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
13.68%
Diluted share count expanding well above METSB.HE's 13.68%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.71%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
35.62%
FCF growth similar to METSB.HE's 35.62%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-32.58%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-20.63%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-1.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
259.95%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with METSB.HE's 259.95%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
117.57%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to METSB.HE's 117.57%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
190.16%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 190.16%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
0.00%
Similar net income/share CAGR to METSB.HE's 0.00%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
-33.33%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-40.00%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
19.20%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with METSB.HE's 19.20%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
24.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with METSB.HE's 24.65%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
18.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 18.48%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.35%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-6.98%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.79%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-13.40%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.07%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-14.50%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.