PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.85%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.31%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-89.49%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-89.49%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-76.26%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-76.43%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-76.43%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.28%
Share count expansion well above METSB.HE's 0.28%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above METSB.HE's 0.28%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
391.03%
Similar OCF growth to METSB.HE's 391.03%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
191.44%
FCF growth similar to METSB.HE's 191.44%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
-3.24%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
2.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 2.12%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
3.58%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 3.58%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
793.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with METSB.HE's 793.33%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
43.94%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to METSB.HE's 43.94%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
4.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 4.91%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-33.77%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-91.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-89.81%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
129.33%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with METSB.HE's 129.33%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
48.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with METSB.HE's 48.29%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
44.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to METSB.HE's 44.74%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.53%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-13.82%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.77%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-2.31%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.32%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.