PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.01%
Revenue growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 1.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
103.08%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 14.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
98.14%
Positive EBIT growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
98.14%
Positive operating income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
92.82%
Positive net income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
92.17%
Positive EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
92.17%
Positive diluted EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-8.36%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-8.36%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
115.38%
Positive OCF growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
205.88%
Positive FCF growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-4.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-4.63%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-4.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 24.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
536.09%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 3.48%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
536.09%
Positive OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
536.09%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
85.78%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
85.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
85.78%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 291.10%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.15%
Inventory is declining while STERV.HE stands at 0.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-2.08%
Negative asset growth while STERV.HE invests at 1.03%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
8.39%
BV/share growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 4.85%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.14%
We’re deleveraging while STERV.HE stands at 2.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.