PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.11%
Positive revenue growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.69%
Positive gross profit growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.12%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-80.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-84.62%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-84.62%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
30.00%
Slight or no buybacks while STERV.HE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
30.00%
Slight or no buyback while STERV.HE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.32%
Positive OCF growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
167.70%
Positive FCF growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-28.85%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-28.85%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-29.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 14.45%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
623.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
623.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 94.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
181.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
105.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
105.76%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-66.67%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while STERV.HE is at 10.86%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.21%
Negative near-term dividend growth while STERV.HE invests at 3400.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.78%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. STERV.HE's 18.73%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-1.92%
Negative asset growth while STERV.HE invests at 0.90%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-25.54%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.64%
We’re deleveraging while STERV.HE stands at 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.