PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.80%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 1.51%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-56.27%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-80.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-80.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-70.67%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-69.81%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-69.81%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.89%
Share reduction while STERV.HE is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.89%
Reduced diluted shares while STERV.HE is at 0.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.83%
OCF growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 92.55%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
21.40%
FCF growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 339.02%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-24.72%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-24.72%
Negative 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 11.69%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-8.80%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
65.54%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 29.50%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
65.54%
Positive OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
446.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 62.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
108.19%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
108.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
102.79%
Positive short-term CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-16.09%
Both are negative. Martin Whitman suspects the segment is in decline or saddled with persistent unprofitability or write-downs.
-16.09%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
10.00%
Positive short-term equity growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while STERV.HE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-2.35%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.32%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.41%
Positive BV/share change while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.