PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.70%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 2.85%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
0.46%
Positive gross profit growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
55.92%
Positive EBIT growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
55.92%
Positive operating income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
86.69%
Net income growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 0.78%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
66.67%
EPS growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 6.25%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
66.67%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 6.25%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
12.01%
Share change of 12.01% while STERV.HE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
12.01%
Diluted share change of 12.01% while STERV.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
71.69%
OCF growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 705.77%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-407.87%
Negative FCF growth while STERV.HE is at 312.22%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-18.90%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-43.53%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-10.34%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
353.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 95.61%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
285.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 40.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
256.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 105.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
152.33%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 1030.65%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
600.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-64.97%
Negative 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.27%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
12.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.47%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-8.40%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-4.19%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-2.07%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.08%
SG&A growth well above STERV.HE's 3.73%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.