5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
127.85%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 9.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-4.11%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.11%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-9.81%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-11.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.50%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.92%
Slight or no buybacks while STERV.HE is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.92%
Slight or no buyback while STERV.HE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-133.84%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-273.86%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-32.13%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-34.81%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-4.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-209.24%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-165.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE is at 1301.64%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-159.11%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 4375.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
120.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-12.50%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
250.00%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 794.12%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.01%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
38.46%
Positive short-term equity growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
42.10%
AR growth well above STERV.HE's 35.16%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
9.75%
Inventory growth well above STERV.HE's 10.91%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
0.51%
Positive asset growth while STERV.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-5.98%
We have a declining book value while STERV.HE shows 1.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
5.85%
We have some new debt while STERV.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-3.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.