PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.21%
Positive revenue growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
15.43%
Positive gross profit growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
96.75%
Positive EBIT growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
96.75%
Positive operating income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
133.94%
Positive net income growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
150.00%
Positive EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
150.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-6.43%
Share reduction while STERV.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-6.43%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.63%
Negative OCF growth while STERV.HE is at 309.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-31.92%
Negative FCF growth while STERV.HE is at 257.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-45.85%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-4.11%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
12.57%
Positive 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
354.26%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
37.09%
Positive OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
119.88%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 2.83%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
600.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-0.00%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while STERV.HE is 13.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
66.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 0.68%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3.68%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 32.74%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
33.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 45.05%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
31.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to STERV.HE's 29.08%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.06%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while STERV.HE is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
42.58%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while STERV.HE cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
2.44%
Our AR growth while STERV.HE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.19%
We show growth while STERV.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.35%
Negative asset growth while STERV.HE invests at 3.55%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
3.07%
Similar to STERV.HE's 3.21%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
4.18%
Debt growth far above STERV.HE's 7.00%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.87%
We expand SG&A while STERV.HE cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.